home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
QRZ! Ham Radio 4
/
QRZ Ham Radio Callsign Database - Volume 4.iso
/
digests
/
tcp
/
940250.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-11-13
|
2KB
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 94 04:30:06 PST
From: Advanced Amateur Radio Networking Group <tcp-group@ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: TCP-Group-Errors@UCSD.Edu
Reply-To: TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu
Precedence: List
Subject: TCP-Group Digest V94 #250
To: tcp-group-digest
TCP-Group Digest Sun, 6 Nov 94 Volume 94 : Issue 250
Today's Topics:
smtp gateway and dns
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu>.
Subscription requests to <TCP-Group-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>.
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 94 11:15:06 UTC
From: kd5lu@kd5lu.ampr.org
Subject: smtp gateway and dns
Scenario: I route my mail to a smtp gateway that also happens to be my
domain name server. I just want my outgoing mail to go to the mail gateway
and let forward it on. However, when I send a note to another location,
the domain name server (it is connected to the internet) gives me back the
ip address and my smtp sender then makes connection (or tries) to the
recipient directly, which causes some problems. Is there a way I can
configure my station to NOT do this ? I know if I drop the name server
it works the way I want it to, but I hate to do that. Thanks in
advance. 73 de Bill, kd5lu.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
kd5lu.ampr.org 44.28.0.119 (145.670) 44.28.1.39 (441.475)
Internet Mail abernat@metronet.com
Work Phone (214) 622-5445
Home Phone (214) 242-1241
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
End of TCP-Group Digest V94 #250
******************************